The following report was prepared by Dr. John Schilling, president of the Council of Elementary Educational Leaders and liaison for the National Association of Elementary School Principals and the California Federal relations coordinator for NAESP.
There have been significant delays in the U.S. Department of Education releasing FY25 state formula grant allocations that states and districts need to set their next school year state budgets.
The department has finally released the allocations for Title I, Title IV, and IDEA but has not yet issued the allocations for Title II.
NAESP along with NASSP, AASA, AFSA, and Learning Forward sent a letter to Education Secretary Linda McMahon urging her to release the allocation information as soon as possible.
NAESP will continue to urge the Department to release information about the remaining funds and will continue to engage with Congress on the issue, which is also growing concerned about the delays, especially as schools finalize their SY25-26 budgets.
The lack of Title II information is concerning because the administration is interested in diverting this pot of funds to other programs or for other purposes.
FY26 funding information
Secretary McMahon testified before Congress in her first FY26 appropriations hearing, where she reaffirmed her intent to close the Department of Education, calling it the department’s “final mission,” and her desire to “Make American Education Great Again.”
The administration is proposing to eliminate 18 K–12 programs, including Title II and Title IV, resulting in a net $4.5 billion cut to K-12 education.
The administration also proposed a $2 billion block grant.
For FY26, Title I funding should remain level at $18.4 billion, while IDEA would receive an “increase” by folding in smaller subprograms such as Preschool Grants ($400 million) and Professional Preparation into the main IDEA funding stream (Part B, grants to states).
The department plans to maintain the main Title I grant but would eliminate the Literacy Development, Migrant, and Neglected & Delinquent Student Grants subprograms.
During a separate appropriations hearing, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy said that Head Start funding would not be cut. Earlier press reports suggested the program was going to be eliminated and the administration’s “skinny budget” made no mention of Head Start.
The budget plan proceeds as if the Department of Education will continue to exist.
Budget reconciliation package
The current budget reconciliation package does not directly impact K–12 education, but it includes major cuts to Medicaid and food assistance to low-income families that will affect school communities.
The House passed the package by a narrow party-line vote of 215–214.
NAESP launched an education awareness campaign to highlight that Medicaid is the fourth largest source of federal K–12 funding which reimburses expenses for school-based health services and IDEA-related services.
The bill includes over $500 billion in cuts to Medicaid. Schools receive approximately $7 billion annually in Medicaid reimbursements, and a cut as severe as this would strain school and state budgets. The package also proposes cuts to food assistance programs, which would reduce the food available to low-income families.
NAESP is urging educators to use this Action Alert (p2a.co/90FQETe) to contact their member of Congress and express concerns about cutting Medicaid.
In addition, House Republicans included a new private school voucher scholarship program in the bill that would give a dollar-for-dollar tax credit to individuals who donate to such programs that are then used to pay for private school vouchers.
The Senate now takes up the package where they are free to make any changes they want. Negotiations are expected to be slow. Senate GOP leaders have set an informal deadline of July 4 to complete action on the bill.
Under a Senate rule created by former Sen. Robert Byrd (WV), no policy-based provisions are allowed to be included in any Senate budget reconciliation bill (only revenue and spending provisions are allowed). You may start to hear bird-related puns as legislators talk about “Byrd baths,” which is the process where provisions are evaluated and stripped out of the bill if deemed to be policy-related.
For example, the Senate could include tax credits for voucher scholarships (revenue-related) but cannot create a program at the Department of Education to support private school vouchers (policy-related).
Read more about the House Budget Reconciliation Package in an FAQ from NAESP at www.naesp.org/blog/budget-reconciliation-what-school-leaders-need-to-know.
Department of Education nominations
The Senate education committee approved the nomination of North Dakota State Superintendent Kirsten Baesler to serve as Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education last week.
The Senate HELP Committee will hold a confirmation hearing June 5 for former Tennessee Commissioner of Education Penny Schwinn to be Deputy Secretary of Education, the Department’s second in command. The Senate Health Committee will hold her confirmation hearing June 5.
Additional nominations for Department of Education leadership roles are awaiting final Senate approval. All nominations are expected to be confirmed.
Supreme Court updates
In St. Isidore v. Drummond, the Supreme Court issued a 4–4 tie on the case involving an Oklahoma religious charter school. The tie leaves the lower court’s ruling in place, allowing the religious charter school to proceed, but the decision does not set a federal precedent. A new case about this issue is expected to be brought up in the future.
Twelve states secured a preliminary injunction against the Department of Education’s efforts to close the agency and ordered the reinstatement of laid off Department staff.
Sixteen states won an injunction requiring the Department of Education to process late COVID relief (ESSER) fund reimbursements.
FYI
FAQ Online
Read more about the House Budget Reconciliation Package in this FAQ produced by NAESP, available at www.naesp.org/blog/budget-reconciliation-what-school-leaders-need-to-know.