EDCAL-ACSALOGO_WHITE.png
NSLAC_7.jpg
The delegation of principals from California lobbied at the U.S. Capitol alongside students from the National Association of Student Councils. From left, Dr. John Schilling; Dr. Teri Daniels; Derrick Lawson; students Julian Cansino (California — student at Lawson’s school), Evan Keith (North Carolina) and Keidra Pierce (Utah); Christine Moore; Kerry Dees; and Diana Vu.
Federal Report
Principals advocate for federal policy and funding
March 24, 2025
Facebook_icon.pngX_Logo.pngLinkedIn_Icon.pngPinterest_icon.pngEmail_share_icon.png
The following report was prepared by Dr. John Schilling, president of the Council of Elementary Educational Leaders and liaison for the National Association of Elementary School Principals and the California Federal Relations Coordinator for NAESP.
ACSA, in collaboration with the National Association of Elementary School Principals (NAESP) and the National Association of Secondary School Principals (NASSP), remains actively engaged in federal and state legislative advocacy amid the ongoing challenges surrounding education funding and policy formulation.
As part of these efforts, a delegation of California school principals and education leaders participated in the National School Leaders Advocacy Conference, held from March 10–13 in Washington, D.C. The delegation was accompanied by three student representatives from the National Association of Student Councils. This initiative underscores a steadfast commitment to advancing education policy and securing financial resources to support California students, educators and school communities.
The ACSA delegation consisted of:
Kerry Dees (Region 5), principal, Green Hills Elementary School, Millbrae Elementary SD, ACSA Region Elementary Council, and NAESP liaison. Dr. John Schilling (Region 10), superintendent/principal, Southside Elementary School District, and ACSA Elementary Education Council president. Christine Moore (Region 16), principal, Luther Burbank Middle School, LAUSD, and ACSA Middle Grades Education Council president. Dr. Terri Daniels (Region 3), principal, Folsom Middle School, Folsom-Cordova USD, and NASSP’s California state coordinator. Derrick Lawson (Region 19), principal, Indio High School, Desert Sands USD, and NASSP Board member. Diana Vu, ACSA legislative advocate.
Engagement with legislators on Capitol Hill serves as a vital mechanism for ensuring that the perspectives of ACSA members are effectively communicated to policymakers. Such discussions play a pivotal role in shaping funding allocations and counteracting legislative and executive actions that may impact public education.
“As we look at Education Policy and how it is administered, the opportunity to amplify the stories of and impact upon the students we are responsible for is invaluable as we advocate for their support and success,” Lawson said. “We cannot abdicate this important role of advising and informing policymakers who are not the education experts.”
Key educational priorities addressed during recent meetings with California legislators included:
  • Addressing educator shortages and strengthening the principal pipeline.
  • Enhancing school mental health, wellness initiatives and safety resources.
  • Advocating for sustained and increased federal K-12 education funding.
“This was such an important year for us to be sharing our voices in support of public education on Capitol Hill. Sharing the experiences we face on our campuses each day is critical for our lawmakers to understand,” Daniels said. “I am proud to be part of the California delegation and to represent our state in such a meaningful way. It truly is a powerful way of getting the voice of principals heard at the national level.”
These advocacy efforts are integral to fostering equitable and effective educational policies that support student achievement and institutional sustainability at the state and federal levels.
“Attending the National School Leaders Advocacy Conference equipped me with the essential tools to effectively meet with our state representatives and members of Congress,” Dees said. “Our public schools urgently need increased funding and support from both the national and state levels. Our collective efforts will lead to positive decisions that directly benefit our students.”
Summary of the president’s education initiatives During the presentation segment of the National School Leadership Advocacy Conference, Scott Palmer, managing partner and co-founder of EducationCounsel, provided an overview of the education policy initiatives advanced by the Trump administration. The key areas of focus included the following:
1. Elimination of the U.S. Department of Education
  • Implementation through budget reconciliation measures and systematic downsizing of the agency.
2. Reform of higher education oversight and accreditation
  • Reduction of Institute of Education Sciences (IES) contracts and termination of teacher leader grant programs.
3. Dismantling of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA) initiatives and reversal of Civil Rights enforcement
  • Issuance of multiple executive orders restricting DEIA efforts.
  • Closure of offices and programs dedicated to civil rights enforcement.
  • Rescission of guidance documents, such as the “Dear Colleague” letter, affecting civil rights protections.
4. Reversal of gender equity protections
  • Issuance of executive orders impacting transgender student rights.
  • Revocation of Title IX protections related to gender identity.
5. Expansion of legal challenges against race-conscious policies
  • Extension of Students for Fair Admissions litigation to restrict race-based considerations in education policy.
6. Increased immigration enforcement and establishment of English as the official language
  • Enactment of immigration-related executive orders.
  • Department of Homeland Security (DHS) actions to enhance immigration enforcement.
  • Issuance of an executive order designating English as the official language.
7. Reduction of federal funding and programs for public schools
  • Budget reductions implemented through the Department of Education and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
  • Termination of Department of Education grants and contracts via budget reconciliation and rescission efforts.
8. Limitations on education data and research initiatives
  • Termination of federally funded education research grants and contracts.
9. Expansion of private school choice, including support for religious institutions
  • Administrative actions promoting school choice and maximizing federal funding allocations for private and religious schools.
  • Congressional advocacy for the Education Choice for Children Act (ECCA).
10. Targeted investments in select education priorities
  • Expansion of school choice and voucher programs.
  • Promotion of increased parental involvement in education policy and school governance.
These policy measures reflect significant shifts in federal education priorities and underscore the evolving role of the federal government in K-12 and higher education.
NSLAC_1.jpg
John Schilling and Chase Christensen train school leaders on advocacy.
NSLAC_5.jpg
Chase Christensen and John Schilling train school leaders on advocacy.