New report calls for rethinking CA educational system roles
December 8, 2025
Policy Analysis for California Education has released a new report, “TK–12 Education Governance in California: Past, Present, and Future,” that offers insights into long-standing structural complexities in California’s education system as well as recommendations for realigning roles and responsibilities to create more coherent education governance in California.
Over the past year, the federal government has initiated an unprecedented dismantling of the U.S. Department of Education, including the withdrawal of federal oversight, research, and technical assistance infrastructure that states have long relied upon. These shifts have already disrupted California’s school systems and pose further profound risks to the state’s ability to sustain a high-quality, equitable education system.
“California can no longer assume that the long-standing federal role in public education will remain intact, nor that federal functions will be restored in a stable or reliable way in the foreseeable future,” said the report’s lead author, PACE Director of Policy Research Jeannie Myung, in a news release. “In this context, California must strengthen its own internal capacity to carry out essential functions that ensure equity and drive improvement in our school systems.”
Since the state’s founding, California’s “double-headed” education governance structure — dividing authority between the elected Superintendent of Public Instruction and the governor-appointed State Board of Education — has contributed to overlapping responsibilities and unclear lines of accountability, according to the report.
Based on interviews with policymakers, researchers, and education leaders, the report identifies how diffuse accountability and fragmented authority undermine policymaking and implementation. Participants rated California’s overall education governance effectiveness at 2.8 out of 5, reflecting concerns about misaligned incentives, uneven capacity to carry out complex directives, and fiscal volatility that limits long-term planning.
Rather than suggesting constitutional changes—which have historically not gained voter approval—the report outlines statutory adjustments that could bring greater coherence and effectiveness. Under this approach:
- The governor would hold clear responsibility for California’s TK–12 system, establishing statewide priorities and shaping policy through the budget process in partnership with the legislature.
- The State Board of Education would continue to translate laws into standards, frameworks, and accountability systems that guide policy and practice statewide, and would appoint a CDE director with the expertise to lead implementation and capacity-building efforts.
- The CDE would function as a trusted source for professional learning, technical assistance, and implementation support, helping districts build capacity to deliver on state priorities and working in close coordination with the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing to ensure that students have access to well-prepared, effective educators. Through regional hubs, the CDE would deliver tailored assistance that strengthens implementation and remains responsive to local context and needs.
- The SPI, as an elected and independent official, would have a strengthened responsibility for evaluation and system accountability, generating nonpartisan assessments of system effectiveness to inform policy and elevating student and family voices to ground California’s educational priorities in community needs.
- County Offices of Education would focus on their unique local strengths: rigorously evaluating district LCAPs and finances, and coordinating countywide resources to support students’ whole child needs.
This structure, aspects of which appear in many other states, offers clearer lines of authority and a more balanced distribution of responsibilities.
Read the full report at https://edpolicyinca.org/sites/default/files/2025-11/r_myung-dec2025_0.pdf.